misasia logo
"If we cannot discuss topics about Internet censorship and surveillance policy at a forum about Internet governance then what is the point of something like the IGF," said Ron Deibert, director of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies and one of ONI's principal investigators. By Rabia Garib
16 Nov 2009

KARACHI, 15 NOVEMBER 2009 - An anti-censorship group holding an event Sunday at the United Nations-sponsored Internet Governance Forum (IGF) in Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt, was disrupted by UN officials who demanded removal of a poster that mentioned Internet firewalls in China.

According to a Pakistani delegate, Shahzad Ahmed of Bytesforall.net, a reception hosted by Open Net Initiative (ONI) was rattled by IGF security, who objected to a poster advertising "Access Controlled", a book being introduced at the event. "The poster was thrown on the floor and we were told to remove it because of the reference to China and Tibet. We refused, and security guards came and removed it. The incident was witnessed by many," Ahmed reported.

The poster promoting ONI's forthcoming book, "Access Controlled" was removed by the IGF's organizers because a sentence in the poster apparently violated UN policy. The sentence in question reads, "The first generation of Internet controls consisted largely of building firewalls at key Internet gateways; China's famous "Great Firewall of China" is one of the first national Internet filtering systems."

"If we cannot discuss topics about Internet censorship and surveillance policy at a forum about Internet governance then what is the point of something like the IGF," said Ron Deibert, director of the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto's Munk Centre for International Studies and one of ONI's principal investigators.

Deibert, one of the organizers of the reception, said he will file a complaint against the censorship of the event and send it to the United Nations Human Rights Commission.

"We condemn this undemocratic act of censoring our event just because someone is trying to impress or be in the good graces of the Chinese government. It is ironic that while people are allowed to gather here to discuss freedom of expression online, censorship and surveillance practices on the Internet, we are being restricted in expressing our views," said Al Alegre of the Foundation for Media Alternatives, a member of the ONI Network.

Comments

Be the first to comment.


Post your comment

  • Please use English to post and reply to comments
  • Please do not use offensive language in the form of racial or ethnic slurs, abuse or personal insults
  • We welcome opinion and debate geared towards finding solutions
  • Please keep comments relevant to the topic
  • All comments are moderated
** Mandatory Field

Name
    **

Email
    **

Country


Comments
Maximum characters allowed: 2000
Disclaimer: All the content posted in this category comes independently from readers of Fairfax Business Media (FBM) Asia publications, unless specified otherwise. Fairfax Business Media (FBM) is not responsible for the opinions of its readers and the content posted by them does not represent the views and opinions of FBM.

Feature

Zafar Anjum

Techlightenment

Are cell phones more dangerous than terrorists?

Is there a connection between cell phones, bees and global food security?
By Zafar Anjum | 17 Mar 2010

RSS Feeds

Add this section to your favourite feed reader.