Raws li tsab ntawv ceeb toom los ntawm The Intercept, Google muab U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) nrog ntau tus kheej cov ntaub ntawv hais txog British tub ntxhais kawm ntawv sau xov xwm Amandla Thomas-Johnson raws li ib tug administrative subpoena uas tsis tau pom zoo los ntawm ib tug kws txiav txim plaub ntug. Cov ntaub ntawv muaj xws li usernames, chaw nyob, IP chaw nyob, xov tooj, thiab bank account cov ntsiab lus. Qhov kev thov tuaj cia li ob teev tom qab tus tub ntxhais kawm ntawv tau qhia tias nws U.S.. Visa tau raug thim rov qab, tom qab nws koom nrog kev tawm tsam pro-Palestinian.
(google logo)
Rooj plaub no qhia txog Asmeskas. tsoomfwv siv ntawm “kev tswj hwm subpoenas”-kev cai lij choj xav tau tawm yam tsis muaj kev saib xyuas kev txiav txim plaub ntug-kom tau txais cov ntaub ntawv ntiag tug los ntawm cov tuam txhab thev naus laus zis txog cov tib neeg tseem ceeb ntawm nws cov cai. While such subpoenas cannot compel the disclosure of private communications like email content, they can be used to gather metadata to identify anonymous accounts.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently urged seven major tech companies to stop complying with such subpoenas, insisting that firms should require judicial confirmation before handing over user data and notify affected individuals to allow time for legal challenges. The journalist involved remarked that when governments and tech giants can easily track and control individuals, society must urgently reconsider what resistance means in the digital age.
Roger Luo said:This case exposes systemic risks in the U.S. legal framework where administrative subpoenas bypass judicial oversight. It challenges tech companies’ ethical obligations to protect user data and underscores the urgent need for transparency and reform in cross-agency data surveillance practices.
Tag nrho cov ntawv thiab cov duab yog los ntawm Is Taws Nem. Yog tias muaj teeb meem copyright, thov hu rau peb hauv lub sijhawm kom rho tawm.
Nug nrog peb