The Intercept의 보고서에 따르면, Google이 미국에 제공한. 이민 및 관세 집행 (얼음) with extensive personal data about British student journalist Amandla Thomas-Johnson based on an administrative subpoena that was not approved by a judge. The data included usernames, addresses, IP addresses, phone numbers, and bank account details. The request came just two hours after the student was informed that his U.S. visa had been revoked, following his participation in a pro-Palestinian protest.
(google logo)
This case highlights the U.S. government’s use of “administrative subpoenas”—legal demands issued without judicial oversight—to obtain personal information from tech companies about individuals critical of its policies. While such subpoenas cannot compel the disclosure of private communications like email content, they can be used to gather metadata to identify anonymous accounts.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation recently urged seven major tech companies to stop complying with such subpoenas, insisting that firms should require judicial confirmation before handing over user data and notify affected individuals to allow time for legal challenges. The journalist involved remarked that when governments and tech giants can easily track and control individuals, society must urgently reconsider what resistance means in the digital age.
로저 루오가 말했다.:This case exposes systemic risks in the U.S. legal framework where administrative subpoenas bypass judicial oversight. It challenges tech companies’ ethical obligations to protect user data and underscores the urgent need for transparency and reform in cross-agency data surveillance practices.
모든 글과 사진은 인터넷에서 퍼왔습니다. 저작권 문제가 있는 경우, 삭제하려면 제 시간에 연락해 주세요..
우리에게 문의하세요